Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Project 365 & Daily Photos
Post your men/ladies at work
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sandpatch" data-source="post: 790373" data-attributes="member: 10543"><p>Kodachrome was great stuff of course and enjoys a well-earned reputation for retaining an almost eternal image quality. Kodachrome required a complex processing and unfortunately I learned too late that Fotomat was NOT the place for processing. As a poor college student and penniless new employee upon graduation, I occasionally used Fotomat to save money and now so regret it. Thankfully I reguarly returned to Kodak/Kodalux processing as soon as I could, but then that too eventually became terrible as Kodak began to engineer its exit from the business in the mid-2000s.</p><p></p><p>In disgust, I shelved my camera and quit taking pictures for five years until the D5100 was introduced, bringing price and quality to an acceptable point for me.</p><p></p><p>A 45 year old Kodachrome with Kodak processing. [Nikkormat FTn] Gotta love it. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite9" alt=":eek:" title="Eek! :eek:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":eek:" /></p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]379588[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sandpatch, post: 790373, member: 10543"] Kodachrome was great stuff of course and enjoys a well-earned reputation for retaining an almost eternal image quality. Kodachrome required a complex processing and unfortunately I learned too late that Fotomat was NOT the place for processing. As a poor college student and penniless new employee upon graduation, I occasionally used Fotomat to save money and now so regret it. Thankfully I reguarly returned to Kodak/Kodalux processing as soon as I could, but then that too eventually became terrible as Kodak began to engineer its exit from the business in the mid-2000s. In disgust, I shelved my camera and quit taking pictures for five years until the D5100 was introduced, bringing price and quality to an acceptable point for me. A 45 year old Kodachrome with Kodak processing. [Nikkormat FTn] Gotta love it. :o [ATTACH=CONFIG]379588._xfImport[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Project 365 & Daily Photos
Post your men/ladies at work
Top