Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
Post your latest purchases.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TwistedThrottle" data-source="post: 798478" data-attributes="member: 46724"><p>I wouldn’t go that far Brent, lol! It was a great lens back in the 90’s before anything digital and before anything comparable came around. It’s soft until f5.6 at which time modern lenses like the 70-300 af-p are sharper. This new lens is super sharp even at f2.8 without any of the awful green and purple fringing that plagued the 80-200. YRMV, but that’s my take on it. I’ll never use that 80-200 again unless I find the need to get a Nikon film camera, it just can’t resolve fine detail like the modern glass can do.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TwistedThrottle, post: 798478, member: 46724"] I wouldn’t go that far Brent, lol! It was a great lens back in the 90’s before anything digital and before anything comparable came around. It’s soft until f5.6 at which time modern lenses like the 70-300 af-p are sharper. This new lens is super sharp even at f2.8 without any of the awful green and purple fringing that plagued the 80-200. YRMV, but that’s my take on it. I’ll never use that 80-200 again unless I find the need to get a Nikon film camera, it just can’t resolve fine detail like the modern glass can do. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
Post your latest purchases.
Top
