Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="TwistedThrottle" data-source="post: 789475" data-attributes="member: 46724"><p>Thanks!  It's no miracle worker, its intended for small setups.  The smaller the lenses and body you have, the more you'll be able to fit but it all depends on how you have the dividers set up.  I think its best to set the dividers up to create 3 even compartments and if done correctly, can collapse on themselves towards the outside to allow one big space if needed.  So far I've used it to fit the smallrig'd z6 with the 14-30 attached and the 24-200 (or the 50 f1.8s or the 24-70 f4) next to it with a little space for a strap or a blower or something else small underneath one of the collapsed dividers- not sure if a 28 or 40 would fit under there, I dont have one to try but for reference the FTZ does fit, but un necessary with either of these lenses.  So I could do the 14-30 attached to the camera, the FTZ under the flap and 70-300 on the side but then when done with the 70-300, there'd have to be a disassembly process before stowage.  There is not a lot of space in there, but the design allows the zipper to close when you got it crammed full of stuff.  It pays to be mindful of what lens is attached and what lens is stored next to the camera in the sling.  They should both fit on the camera in the space allowed for the camera or else you're swapping lenses back before storing the camera (Capture Clip?)The sling is taller than the cubes and so the longer lenses like a 70-300 or the 105 macro that should lay down in the cubes, (and waste all the space above the lens in their little compartments) they have enough space to stand up in the sling but then there isnt enough room for a lens'd camera to fit too, so its a tradeoff.  The 10l may be a better fit if you want a 3 lens kit with you or if the lenses you use are of the larger variety, but its a bigger bag and I was after a smaller one so the 6l does great with 2 lenses.</p></blockquote><p></p>

Verification