Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
Post your latest purchases.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="singlerosa_RIP" data-source="post: 484291" data-attributes="member: 15556"><p>Joined the queue for this yesterday. Bye bye 70-300VR.</p><p></p><p> btw, check out this excerpt from the always-goofy Ken Rockwell's review on the 200-500:</p><p>[SIZE=+2]<strong>Versus Junk Brands</strong>[/SIZE]</p><p>The main reason junk brands are bad buys is because they are short-term buys. After their warranties expire, it's not likely that you'll be able to get them repaired when they break, and very likely that they will not work with whatever new camera you buy ten years from now. </p><p>These brands don't make the effort to update years-old lenses to work with new cameras; they step away from the issue like a hot potato and hope you buy a new lens from them instead seven years from now.</p><p>When I buy good lenses like Nikon, I know they will last me for decades, always working on my new cameras and repairable if it breaks.</p><p>With the junk brands, you seem to get a deal if you only think short term, but when I pay over a thousand dollars for a lens, I expect it to last me for decades. :mask:</p><p style="text-align: center">[ATTACH=full]174587[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="singlerosa_RIP, post: 484291, member: 15556"] Joined the queue for this yesterday. Bye bye 70-300VR. btw, check out this excerpt from the always-goofy Ken Rockwell's review on the 200-500: [SIZE=+2][B]Versus Junk Brands[/B][/SIZE] The main reason junk brands are bad buys is because they are short-term buys. After their warranties expire, it's not likely that you'll be able to get them repaired when they break, and very likely that they will not work with whatever new camera you buy ten years from now. These brands don't make the effort to update years-old lenses to work with new cameras; they step away from the issue like a hot potato and hope you buy a new lens from them instead seven years from now. When I buy good lenses like Nikon, I know they will last me for decades, always working on my new cameras and repairable if it breaks. With the junk brands, you seem to get a deal if you only think short term, but when I pay over a thousand dollars for a lens, I expect it to last me for decades. :mask: [CENTER][ATTACH type="full" width="30%"]174587._xfImport[/ATTACH][/CENTER] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
Post your latest purchases.
Top