Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
Post your latest purchases.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Moab Man" data-source="post: 459107" data-attributes="member: 11881"><p>Added a couple of new monopods to the arsenal of stuff. Primarily to replace the cheap ones I had purchased years ago that served me very well. The first one is a Manfrotto 680B Photo Compact. The name is misleading, this is a beast of a monopod with a huge pipe diameter. It will be very useful for some of our big lenses. </p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.manfrotto.com/compact-4-section-monopod" target="_blank">Compact 4-Section Monopod 680B - Compact | Manfrotto</a></p><p></p><p>The second tripod is a Manfrotto 290 Series Carbon Fiber. Not as hefty as the above, but plenty solid.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.manfrotto.com/294-carbon-fiber-monopod-4-sections-mm294c4" target="_blank">294 Carbon Fiber Monopod 4 Sections MM294C4 - 290 Series | Manfrotto</a></p><p></p><p>These are both really nice monopods. However, after using cheap monopods and higher end monopods, I would never knock a cheaper monopod. It's a simple tool that does not require a large investment to get this tool to do what it is supposed to. This of course leads to the point of why did I go to the higher end models? After years of wear and tear they simply started to show their age under the heavy lenses I often use. Legs started to collapse, foam grip no longer staying in place, and the top platform not as tight as it once was. With all that said, I cannot refute having got my money worth out of the cheap units.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Moab Man, post: 459107, member: 11881"] Added a couple of new monopods to the arsenal of stuff. Primarily to replace the cheap ones I had purchased years ago that served me very well. The first one is a Manfrotto 680B Photo Compact. The name is misleading, this is a beast of a monopod with a huge pipe diameter. It will be very useful for some of our big lenses. [url=http://www.manfrotto.com/compact-4-section-monopod]Compact 4-Section Monopod 680B - Compact | Manfrotto[/url] The second tripod is a Manfrotto 290 Series Carbon Fiber. Not as hefty as the above, but plenty solid. [url=http://www.manfrotto.com/294-carbon-fiber-monopod-4-sections-mm294c4]294 Carbon Fiber Monopod 4 Sections MM294C4 - 290 Series | Manfrotto[/url] These are both really nice monopods. However, after using cheap monopods and higher end monopods, I would never knock a cheaper monopod. It's a simple tool that does not require a large investment to get this tool to do what it is supposed to. This of course leads to the point of why did I go to the higher end models? After years of wear and tear they simply started to show their age under the heavy lenses I often use. Legs started to collapse, foam grip no longer staying in place, and the top platform not as tight as it once was. With all that said, I cannot refute having got my money worth out of the cheap units. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
Post your latest purchases.
Top