Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
Post your latest purchases.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="hark" data-source="post: 379270" data-attributes="member: 13196"><p>I have a question on something Matt said. When he initially did the test, the #1 was in sharper focus than any other number--so it focused in front of where it should have. Yet he said the lens was back-focusing. Is that correct? <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite5" alt=":confused:" title="Confused :confused:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":confused:" /> I would have said the lens was front-focusing. Would someone please explain?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="hark, post: 379270, member: 13196"] I have a question on something Matt said. When he initially did the test, the #1 was in sharper focus than any other number--so it focused in front of where it should have. Yet he said the lens was back-focusing. Is that correct? :confused: I would have said the lens was front-focusing. Would someone please explain? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
Post your latest purchases.
Top
