Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mark F" data-source="post: 327306" data-attributes="member: 12825">The smile faces was an indicator for tongue in cheek.&nbsp; But...I was a microsoft fanboy from 1989 until 2005.&nbsp; Best os they ever came out with IMO was DOS and 2000 Pro.&nbsp; Apple just works Again IMO.&nbsp; I don't mind paying a little more for a lot less frustration.&nbsp; And if you look at some of the new prices now for laptops, tablets, and desktops... they are almost as much as what apple sells for.&nbsp; Except for the Mac Pro. But you get what you get with it... and its for serious number crunchers who need that kind of horse power.&nbsp; Maybe photostacking 20+ D800 raw files or something <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />I agree the profit margin is high.&nbsp;&nbsp; But Apple isn't the only one out there making that high a profit margin.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mark F, post: 327306, member: 12825"] The smile faces was an indicator for tongue in cheek. But... I was a microsoft fanboy from 1989 until 2005. Best os they ever came out with IMO was DOS and 2000 Pro. Apple just works Again IMO. I don't mind paying a little more for a lot less frustration. And if you look at some of the new prices now for laptops, tablets, and desktops... they are almost as much as what apple sells for. Except for the Mac Pro. But you get what you get with it... and its for serious number crunchers who need that kind of horse power. Maybe photostacking 20+ D800 raw files or something :) I agree the profit margin is high. But Apple isn't the only one out there making that high a profit margin. [/QUOTE]

Verification