Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Landscape
Post Your Landscape Photos
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="J-see" data-source="post: 398514" data-attributes="member: 31330"><p>These are the shots processed identical with both the same WB settings. The only difference is two stops of light added to the ISO 100 to have the same exposure. The aperture slightly differs and a car drove by during one of both but that should not be of any consequence. I have others where the same difference is happening.</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]131732[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]131733[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>As you see, they are pretty identical, as expected, so I have no idea why the auto-WB is that different for both originals.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="J-see, post: 398514, member: 31330"] These are the shots processed identical with both the same WB settings. The only difference is two stops of light added to the ISO 100 to have the same exposure. The aperture slightly differs and a car drove by during one of both but that should not be of any consequence. I have others where the same difference is happening. [ATTACH=CONFIG]131732._xfImport[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]131733._xfImport[/ATTACH] As you see, they are pretty identical, as expected, so I have no idea why the auto-WB is that different for both originals. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Landscape
Post Your Landscape Photos
Top
