Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Landscape
Post Your Landscape Photos
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="J-see" data-source="post: 398456" data-attributes="member: 31330"><p>I've been looking into this some more and still can't find a decent explanation for the rather drastic temperature difference between 100 and 400 ISO. One could assume that if auto-WB is applied depending the values of the captured shot, the 400 being 2 stops "brighter" than the 100 would be processed warmer. Yet strangely it is the more exposed that is cooled down to 3.5k while the least exposed is processed with a daylight temperature.</p><p></p><p>The cool blue/purple 400 ISO is closest to what I observed before taking the shot. One could say that matches reality. However, and now it gets really funky, there is such a thing like the Purkinje effect; during low illumination the sensitivity of the human eye shifts towards the blue end of the color spectrum.</p><p></p><p>So either the 400 is correct because it matches what I observed, or the 100 is correct because it matches what was truly there to be observed. In the end, I will never know which of both is accurate.</p><p></p><p>Ain't that funny.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="J-see, post: 398456, member: 31330"] I've been looking into this some more and still can't find a decent explanation for the rather drastic temperature difference between 100 and 400 ISO. One could assume that if auto-WB is applied depending the values of the captured shot, the 400 being 2 stops "brighter" than the 100 would be processed warmer. Yet strangely it is the more exposed that is cooled down to 3.5k while the least exposed is processed with a daylight temperature. The cool blue/purple 400 ISO is closest to what I observed before taking the shot. One could say that matches reality. However, and now it gets really funky, there is such a thing like the Purkinje effect; during low illumination the sensitivity of the human eye shifts towards the blue end of the color spectrum. So either the 400 is correct because it matches what I observed, or the 100 is correct because it matches what was truly there to be observed. In the end, I will never know which of both is accurate. Ain't that funny. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Landscape
Post Your Landscape Photos
Top