Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Architecture
Post your church shots
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Blue439" data-source="post: 829062" data-attributes="member: 53455"><p>It does indeed. However, you see that the traditional barrel arches (in fact they are so low in that crypt that they could preferably be called “basket handle arches”) are only used in what are called “transverse arches”, i.e., those arches that are supported by thick pillars on the sides, so that those transverse arches can, in turn, support part of the vaulting.</p><p></p><p>Wherever the vaulting is “thrown across the void”, basically (i.e., between the side pillars), rib vaulting is used to direct the thrust towards the four corners.</p><p></p><p>In the second photo, you see the deep end of the crypt, with the altar where the bones of Saint Giles were. Rib vaulting was also used there, even though there are supporting walls on each side. Your question prompted me to wonder why, and I looked at the floor plan. There I saw that the bell tower, which was largely truncated during the French Revolution, was originally standing right above that row of the crypt. Because of the additional weight, the architects deemed it prudent to use rib vaulting here as well, to better direct the thrust from that weight. Ar least that’s what seems logical to me... but I am no architect! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite30" alt=":geek:" title="Geek :geek:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":geek:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Blue439, post: 829062, member: 53455"] It does indeed. However, you see that the traditional barrel arches (in fact they are so low in that crypt that they could preferably be called “basket handle arches”) are only used in what are called “transverse arches”, i.e., those arches that are supported by thick pillars on the sides, so that those transverse arches can, in turn, support part of the vaulting. Wherever the vaulting is “thrown across the void”, basically (i.e., between the side pillars), rib vaulting is used to direct the thrust towards the four corners. In the second photo, you see the deep end of the crypt, with the altar where the bones of Saint Giles were. Rib vaulting was also used there, even though there are supporting walls on each side. Your question prompted me to wonder why, and I looked at the floor plan. There I saw that the bell tower, which was largely truncated during the French Revolution, was originally standing right above that row of the crypt. Because of the additional weight, the architects deemed it prudent to use rib vaulting here as well, to better direct the thrust from that weight. Ar least that’s what seems logical to me... but I am no architect! :geek: [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Architecture
Post your church shots
Top