Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Wild Life
Post your Birds in Flight
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fortkentdad" data-source="post: 580530" data-attributes="member: 24285"><p>[ATTACH]227480[/ATTACH][ATTACH]227481[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>Did a little duck hunting with my D7100 and Nikkor 200-500 today </p><p></p><p>On the walk out into the marsh I had the Kenko 1.4 TC attached - on the way back it was off. Not an exact comparison but it was a learning experience. While have a 35mm equivalent reach over 1050mm (that's what shows up in the metadata) that sounds marvelous. There is some compromise. AF is significantly slower to lock - but does - I'm getting better at it. But I.Q. suffers too. Is that extra reach worth it? Good question. </p><p></p><p>Given that distance to bird and lighting would be different in these two shots it is not a fair comparison but overall when it comes to BIF's especially the T.C. is debatable advantage.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fortkentdad, post: 580530, member: 24285"] [ATTACH=CONFIG]227480._xfImport[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]227481._xfImport[/ATTACH] Did a little duck hunting with my D7100 and Nikkor 200-500 today On the walk out into the marsh I had the Kenko 1.4 TC attached - on the way back it was off. Not an exact comparison but it was a learning experience. While have a 35mm equivalent reach over 1050mm (that's what shows up in the metadata) that sounds marvelous. There is some compromise. AF is significantly slower to lock - but does - I'm getting better at it. But I.Q. suffers too. Is that extra reach worth it? Good question. Given that distance to bird and lighting would be different in these two shots it is not a fair comparison but overall when it comes to BIF's especially the T.C. is debatable advantage. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Wild Life
Post your Birds in Flight
Top
