Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Post Processing
Post your 'before' and 'after' pictures
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="J-see" data-source="post: 484936" data-attributes="member: 31330"><p>I think the first is saturated too much. I always shoot native ISO but when processing in RGB in the past, when I increased luminosity, I also affected the colors which results in too colorful images, especially when lifting the shadows too much and pushing them towards the midtones.</p><p></p><p>The second only has minimal exposure increase in RGB and the rest was increased using LAB where luminosity is a separate value. I also did not lift the shadows. There's more contrast than in the first. You even see it in the water. There's also a lot more detail in the second. I didn't have wavelets those days.</p><p></p><p>Mind you, I liked the first shot when I processed it but these days I prefer the more natural look. The first is almost like the same dog at a young age while the second shows it as is.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="J-see, post: 484936, member: 31330"] I think the first is saturated too much. I always shoot native ISO but when processing in RGB in the past, when I increased luminosity, I also affected the colors which results in too colorful images, especially when lifting the shadows too much and pushing them towards the midtones. The second only has minimal exposure increase in RGB and the rest was increased using LAB where luminosity is a separate value. I also did not lift the shadows. There's more contrast than in the first. You even see it in the water. There's also a lot more detail in the second. I didn't have wavelets those days. Mind you, I liked the first shot when I processed it but these days I prefer the more natural look. The first is almost like the same dog at a young age while the second shows it as is. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Post Processing
Post your 'before' and 'after' pictures
Top
