Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Post Processing
Post your 'before' and 'after' pictures
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FastGlass" data-source="post: 406402" data-attributes="member: 13822"><p>I clicked on this thread on this page. I had to go back to page 6 to see where all hell broke loose. It's very amusing to read the bickering back and forth. The only thing I can't figure out is when shooting an image so underexposed. How do you pull detail out of the shadows later on? If looking at the histogram it's obviously clipping on the left. Clipping is loosing detail. </p><p> As far as the way people shoot. I don't believe there is a right or wrong way of doing it. If in the end you get the result you want, you've accomplished what you set out to do. Would you criticize a painter for what brush he chooses? If an image is taken and it grabs someones attention in a positive way. you've won. When I saw J-see's image of the correctly exposed duck it looked pretty good. Who am I to tell him how he accomplished it was wrong. </p><p> It's easier to criticize others work rather than hearing how we should improve our own. </p><p> J-see I don't understand the reasoning of how you shot this. I don't really care. Your work speaks for it's self, excellent.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FastGlass, post: 406402, member: 13822"] I clicked on this thread on this page. I had to go back to page 6 to see where all hell broke loose. It's very amusing to read the bickering back and forth. The only thing I can't figure out is when shooting an image so underexposed. How do you pull detail out of the shadows later on? If looking at the histogram it's obviously clipping on the left. Clipping is loosing detail. As far as the way people shoot. I don't believe there is a right or wrong way of doing it. If in the end you get the result you want, you've accomplished what you set out to do. Would you criticize a painter for what brush he chooses? If an image is taken and it grabs someones attention in a positive way. you've won. When I saw J-see's image of the correctly exposed duck it looked pretty good. Who am I to tell him how he accomplished it was wrong. It's easier to criticize others work rather than hearing how we should improve our own. J-see I don't understand the reasoning of how you shot this. I don't really care. Your work speaks for it's self, excellent. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Post Processing
Post your 'before' and 'after' pictures
Top