Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Post Processing
Post your 'before' and 'after' pictures
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Blade Canyon" data-source="post: 406298" data-attributes="member: 15302"><p>Okay, I understand your point, J-see. You say that, shutter speed and aperture being the same, it doesn't matter what ISO you shoot because for higher ISOs the camera is only doing a software adjustment, and you can do that same thing in post. In fact, your computer processor and software are probably more powerful than whatever's built into the camera anyway.</p><p></p><p>I can possibly believe this, but have never heard it before. I will experiment with the idea tonight.</p><p></p><p>That said, this book "The Digital SLR Expert: Landscapes" by Tom Mackie et al. says that the reason you want a good histogram in your original shot is because 75% of your sensor is used for the highest two stops, and doing it your way would not do that. I'll just let them explain it in the attached scan:</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]134751[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Blade Canyon, post: 406298, member: 15302"] Okay, I understand your point, J-see. You say that, shutter speed and aperture being the same, it doesn't matter what ISO you shoot because for higher ISOs the camera is only doing a software adjustment, and you can do that same thing in post. In fact, your computer processor and software are probably more powerful than whatever's built into the camera anyway. I can possibly believe this, but have never heard it before. I will experiment with the idea tonight. That said, this book "The Digital SLR Expert: Landscapes" by Tom Mackie et al. says that the reason you want a good histogram in your original shot is because 75% of your sensor is used for the highest two stops, and doing it your way would not do that. I'll just let them explain it in the attached scan: [ATTACH=CONFIG]134751._xfImport[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Post Processing
Post your 'before' and 'after' pictures
Top
