Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Post Processing
Post your 'before' and 'after' pictures
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="J-see" data-source="post: 406224" data-attributes="member: 31330"><p>The black shots are identically exposed to would I shoot them at high ISO but I keep my DR, tone range and color sensitivity at max. The same for my SNR. All that is different is that I skip the process of ISO that is done during A/D conversion.</p><p></p><p>My RAWs look underexposed but all the info is there and I can get a better picture out of it than I could before. It's the result that is more important than the process. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="J-see, post: 406224, member: 31330"] The black shots are identically exposed to would I shoot them at high ISO but I keep my DR, tone range and color sensitivity at max. The same for my SNR. All that is different is that I skip the process of ISO that is done during A/D conversion. My RAWs look underexposed but all the info is there and I can get a better picture out of it than I could before. It's the result that is more important than the process. ;) [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Post Processing
Post your 'before' and 'after' pictures
Top
