Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="J-see" data-source="post: 431145" data-attributes="member: 31330">Of course but there's a reasonable difference between the Tam at a short distance and at a long distance using the same focal length. That she can't resolve the same detail is normal but there's more than that I think. At least from what I notice in my shots. Not that it is a dramatic difference.I just went through my shots and of all I've taken today, the majority are head-shots and close distance shots. Most of them are at 5-6m. When distance increases, the rate of shots that I delete increases simultaneously. The majority of my close shots are keepers while only a minority of the others are.Now it's easier for focus to lock in at close range than it is at double the range and I go through my selection at 100% and delete everything that doesn't have that amount of sharpness I require but even when keeping that in mind, for my cam, she get sloppy when distances increase.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="J-see, post: 431145, member: 31330"] Of course but there's a reasonable difference between the Tam at a short distance and at a long distance using the same focal length. That she can't resolve the same detail is normal but there's more than that I think. At least from what I notice in my shots. Not that it is a dramatic difference. I just went through my shots and of all I've taken today, the majority are head-shots and close distance shots. Most of them are at 5-6m. When distance increases, the rate of shots that I delete increases simultaneously. The majority of my close shots are keepers while only a minority of the others are. Now it's easier for focus to lock in at close range than it is at double the range and I go through my selection at 100% and delete everything that doesn't have that amount of sharpness I require but even when keeping that in mind, for my cam, she get sloppy when distances increase. [/QUOTE]

Verification