Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Post your 150-600 Tamron shots.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="fhibbs12" data-source="post: 423569" data-attributes="member: 12196"><p>Would hate to spend 200+ renting all 3 to compare when that would be 20% of the cost of the Tamron.</p><p></p><p>Was just trying to scour for some sample images to see whats possible.</p><p></p><p>I already use Tamrons 70-200 VC USD but am needing something longer for outfields and cross field shots.</p><p></p><p>I "feel" the new tamron wide angle and superzoom for 2200 would be a better bang for my buck than the 300 PF + extender. I would be filling a gap wider than my 35 1.4 Art and longer that the 70-200.</p><p></p><p>Just wanted some reassurance I guess.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="fhibbs12, post: 423569, member: 12196"] Would hate to spend 200+ renting all 3 to compare when that would be 20% of the cost of the Tamron. Was just trying to scour for some sample images to see whats possible. I already use Tamrons 70-200 VC USD but am needing something longer for outfields and cross field shots. I "feel" the new tamron wide angle and superzoom for 2200 would be a better bang for my buck than the 300 PF + extender. I would be filling a gap wider than my 35 1.4 Art and longer that the 70-200. Just wanted some reassurance I guess. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Post your 150-600 Tamron shots.
Top
