Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Computers and Software
Post processing age old debate!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="J-see" data-source="post: 354643" data-attributes="member: 31330"><p>If the camera could do that, it was probably smart enough to do the rest too. I'd wake it up in the morning and tell it to take some bug-shots while I have coffee and read the newspaper.</p><p></p><p>I think many see the RAW vs JPG issue in a wrong light. Using JPG doesn't imply you won't be satisfied about your end-result. It's not an inferior format that by definition produces lower quality images. If you like the JPG, all is well. The problem only surfaces when you're not satisfied. Then you regret not having used RAW.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="J-see, post: 354643, member: 31330"] If the camera could do that, it was probably smart enough to do the rest too. I'd wake it up in the morning and tell it to take some bug-shots while I have coffee and read the newspaper. I think many see the RAW vs JPG issue in a wrong light. Using JPG doesn't imply you won't be satisfied about your end-result. It's not an inferior format that by definition produces lower quality images. If you like the JPG, all is well. The problem only surfaces when you're not satisfied. Then you regret not having used RAW. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Computers and Software
Post processing age old debate!
Top
