Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="stmv" data-source="post: 96255" data-attributes="member: 10038">This has been a theme throughout the year on the rags, which are biased against the D800, and pick on the megapixels.. how sillyI shot with a D700 for 4 years, and for the last 9 months been using my D800, and frankly, bairly use the D700, the D800 is just that good. I have no issues with speed of the camera, use of lens, computer (I did upgrade my notebook to an I4 generation but not top of the line), and CS6 works fine, plenty fast. Oh my,, some fragment of sport shooters might want 2 frames per second faster burst.. jeesh I am so glad,, super glad, that Nikon came out with the high pixel camera..Just wait until Canon comes out with the 40 Meg camera, then the same folks will change their tune. but go Mark III yippee,, hey where's your bracket button? I&nbsp; have shot with both, and would I trade my D800 for a Mark III,, hahahahaha</blockquote>

[QUOTE="stmv, post: 96255, member: 10038"] This has been a theme throughout the year on the rags, which are biased against the D800, and pick on the megapixels.. how silly I shot with a D700 for 4 years, and for the last 9 months been using my D800, and frankly, bairly use the D700, the D800 is just that good. I have no issues with speed of the camera, use of lens, computer (I did upgrade my notebook to an I4 generation but not top of the line), and CS6 works fine, plenty fast. Oh my,, some fragment of sport shooters might want 2 frames per second faster burst.. jeesh I am so glad,, super glad, that Nikon came out with the high pixel camera.. Just wait until Canon comes out with the 40 Meg camera, then the same folks will change their tune. but go Mark III yippee,, hey where's your bracket button? I have shot with both, and would I trade my D800 for a Mark III,, hahahahaha [/QUOTE]

Verification