Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="rocketman122" data-source="post: 333548" data-attributes="member: 14443">OP, I understand where youre coming from. pay no attention to those posting negative comments. many here are just protecting the nikon name. what? god forbid you said something bad about nikon. you are new coming into this site and people feel thy need to protect the nikon name. most think its a troll post by canon users. pay no attention though. I believe you have a clear case here. and I agree with you 100%. people accept that this IQ is ok for the camera and that basically u must edit after the fact. never had to spend so much time with an image in the film days. but the problem is no matter what picture control setting you will use, you will not be able to get the image you need in the end straight out of the camera. it wont happen. the camera is limited. its a big negative I have about cameras. so be aware that you will need to adjust and edit every single image for the final look. when I looked at your first image, I was curious why you didnt leave exif data in, but I did say to myself. yea, thats the crap pictures the nikon can produce. not that any MFR is better. thats what cameras can do today. they have a long way to go. metering as well is very lacking. and the sharpening algorithm is crap as well. canon has a great sharpening algorithm but you loose a lot of fine detail with smearing. canons are excellent for the beauty/fashion/glamour industry because theyre very sharp but waxy/plasticky where a lot of fine detail is lost and thats great for the face. basically know that this is what the camera can do. thats the limit. you will have to edit the pics to get the final look to the picture. just dont crazy like most do and filter the crap out of the image. dont be a "me too" instagram protog.</blockquote>

Verification