Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Polarising filter and UV filter?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="J-see" data-source="post: 475189" data-attributes="member: 31330"><p>For stacking an UV + CPL there is a definitive answer; it's not needed and can at worst only have negative consequences. The UV does nothing but protect the lens which a CPL also does when you put it in front of the lens. So if you use the CPL, remove the UV.</p><p></p><p>There is no definite answer to the matter of protection or not; we all have to make up our own mind. I never did see the need for protection until I got more expensive lenses and my 35mm got scratched. If I'd rank all my lenses according to use, the 35mm is somewhere at the bottom so it is ironic she got damaged. I never dropped it nor bumped it and generally take better care of my lenses than my women and yet, it happened. It's just bad luck but when the price of your lenses goes up, ruling out bad luck pays more and more. It doesn't make sense to put a 100$ filter on a 100$ lens but if the lens costs 1k or more, it's a small percentage.</p><p></p><p>Unless you buy a 5$ UV from Lu Bish in China, it won't affect IQ negatively.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="J-see, post: 475189, member: 31330"] For stacking an UV + CPL there is a definitive answer; it's not needed and can at worst only have negative consequences. The UV does nothing but protect the lens which a CPL also does when you put it in front of the lens. So if you use the CPL, remove the UV. There is no definite answer to the matter of protection or not; we all have to make up our own mind. I never did see the need for protection until I got more expensive lenses and my 35mm got scratched. If I'd rank all my lenses according to use, the 35mm is somewhere at the bottom so it is ironic she got damaged. I never dropped it nor bumped it and generally take better care of my lenses than my women and yet, it happened. It's just bad luck but when the price of your lenses goes up, ruling out bad luck pays more and more. It doesn't make sense to put a 100$ filter on a 100$ lens but if the lens costs 1k or more, it's a small percentage. Unless you buy a 5$ UV from Lu Bish in China, it won't affect IQ negatively. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Polarising filter and UV filter?
Top