Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Disorderly" data-source="post: 79248" data-attributes="member: 10297">It's an important point.  One aspect of what you hope to accomplish is the resolution of the final result.  If all you want is web size or even printed output at moderate size, a lens like this may be fine, at least after you've done some cleanup of the images.  I submit a lot of images to microstock agencies for resale.  They're pixel peepers who look at every image at 100%.  Faults that may not show up at web size will be glaring problems at full resolution.  So for me it's worth using a set of constant aperture zooms and a few select primes.  A superzoom would be a waste of money for me, since every shot I take is a candidate for my stock portfolio.  Your mileage may be different.</blockquote>