Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
General Digital SLR Cameras
Please show me samples why full frame is better than crop? Take the challenge
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WayneF" data-source="post: 358838" data-attributes="member: 12496"><p>You might not be getting it yet. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> Just open any old previous image in your photo editer, make a duplicate, and then crop one of them to be 2/3 the size of first. Then zoom to enlarge the small one to show same size as the large one, side by side. </p><p></p><p>If assuming same lens is used (as true in this photo), this is exactly what DX does compared to FX. It is a crop, nothing more, nothing less... a crop. This crop and enlargement shows the same telephoto effect we imagine we see in DX. </p><p></p><p>We do choose different lenses to accommodate the different cropped view we see. And these different lenses do react accordingly. For example, 24mm is rather wide angle on FX, but is only slightly wide, a more normal view for DX. Cropped DX has to use a 16mm lens to see the same wide view as uncropped FX with 24mm. And a 16mm lens is becoming more extreme optically, likely more distortions, more diffraction, etc. Depth of field is different too.</p><p></p><p>Sensors vary widely too, and sensor pixel density can be a factor (resolution and noise). These have been FX advantages (and the wide angle views too).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WayneF, post: 358838, member: 12496"] You might not be getting it yet. :) Just open any old previous image in your photo editer, make a duplicate, and then crop one of them to be 2/3 the size of first. Then zoom to enlarge the small one to show same size as the large one, side by side. If assuming same lens is used (as true in this photo), this is exactly what DX does compared to FX. It is a crop, nothing more, nothing less... a crop. This crop and enlargement shows the same telephoto effect we imagine we see in DX. We do choose different lenses to accommodate the different cropped view we see. And these different lenses do react accordingly. For example, 24mm is rather wide angle on FX, but is only slightly wide, a more normal view for DX. Cropped DX has to use a 16mm lens to see the same wide view as uncropped FX with 24mm. And a 16mm lens is becoming more extreme optically, likely more distortions, more diffraction, etc. Depth of field is different too. Sensors vary widely too, and sensor pixel density can be a factor (resolution and noise). These have been FX advantages (and the wide angle views too). [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
General Digital SLR Cameras
Please show me samples why full frame is better than crop? Take the challenge
Top