Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Prime
Please Help !!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="torgo" data-source="post: 3269" data-attributes="member: 909"><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'">This almost sounds like a job interview question. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'">Anyway, my experience from owning the 50mm f/1.8 AF-D and the 35mm f/2 AF-D on my D50 is that I use the 35mm more. But that's because right now I'm usually following my 3 year old daughter around taking pictures of her, and the 35mm lets me get more in to show where she's doing what she's doing, not just a close-up.</span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'">The 50mm goes on sometimes too, when I want to get a little tighter, but the 35mm's angle of view is a little more forgiving when composing, and I find it easier to get closer rather than back up.</span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'">Technically, I've heard the 35mm f/1.8 is a pretty nice lens (nicer than the 35mm f/2, and cheaper too, but I got mine back before the 1.8 was out), and is pretty highly recommended. But I'd say the main answer will come from your shooting style - wider or tighter? If you have a kit lens that covers both 35mm and 50mm, I'd suggest taping it at 35mm for a day or two, and then at 50mm for a day or two, and see what you like most.</span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'">Or get both! Neither lens is particularly expensive. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="torgo, post: 3269, member: 909"] [FONT="Georgia"]This almost sounds like a job interview question. :) Anyway, my experience from owning the 50mm f/1.8 AF-D and the 35mm f/2 AF-D on my D50 is that I use the 35mm more. But that's because right now I'm usually following my 3 year old daughter around taking pictures of her, and the 35mm lets me get more in to show where she's doing what she's doing, not just a close-up. The 50mm goes on sometimes too, when I want to get a little tighter, but the 35mm's angle of view is a little more forgiving when composing, and I find it easier to get closer rather than back up. Technically, I've heard the 35mm f/1.8 is a pretty nice lens (nicer than the 35mm f/2, and cheaper too, but I got mine back before the 1.8 was out), and is pretty highly recommended. But I'd say the main answer will come from your shooting style - wider or tighter? If you have a kit lens that covers both 35mm and 50mm, I'd suggest taping it at 35mm for a day or two, and then at 50mm for a day or two, and see what you like most. Or get both! Neither lens is particularly expensive. ;)[/FONT] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Prime
Please Help !!
Top