Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Plastic Lenses Vs. Others
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="crycocyon" data-source="post: 144366" data-attributes="member: 13076"><p>An NDA that you claimed you signed still doesn't mean anything. An NDA is related to intellectual property protection, and any lens out there now in production has already had the patents pending or granted so an NDA wouldn't be necessary. So even mention of an NDA makes no sense in the context of this discussion.</p><p></p><p>Canon did not specifically say they use those elements. That page, again, refers to types of elements one <em><strong>could</strong></em> use to correct for abberations.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="crycocyon, post: 144366, member: 13076"] An NDA that you claimed you signed still doesn't mean anything. An NDA is related to intellectual property protection, and any lens out there now in production has already had the patents pending or granted so an NDA wouldn't be necessary. So even mention of an NDA makes no sense in the context of this discussion. Canon did not specifically say they use those elements. That page, again, refers to types of elements one [I][B]could[/B][/I] use to correct for abberations. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Plastic Lenses Vs. Others
Top