Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="AntrimHills" data-source="post: 66987" data-attributes="member: 9936">Don't ask me to explain it, the D90 feels better quality. Not to mention the wider range of lenses.&nbsp; Not to mention that whilst the D5100 has a movable LCD, which some may see as an advantage, I think it's something that might get broken easily.&nbsp; Not to mention it has a pentaprism as opposed to a pentamirror, nor less shutter lag, nor larger viewfinder, nor better battery life... and so the list goes on.&nbsp; Yes, the 5100 has higher res movies, hdr, greater color depth, is smaller, lighter and cheaper.&nbsp; Personally, I think movies are for video cameras, hdr is a shortcut to editing the photo yourself; smaller, lighter and cheaper doesn't instill confidence in its build quality, so to gain a little color depth is neither here nor there.I would still pick the D90... that my opinion, for what it's worth</blockquote>

[QUOTE="AntrimHills, post: 66987, member: 9936"] Don't ask me to explain it, the D90 feels better quality. Not to mention the wider range of lenses. Not to mention that whilst the D5100 has a movable LCD, which some may see as an advantage, I think it's something that might get broken easily. Not to mention it has a pentaprism as opposed to a pentamirror, nor less shutter lag, nor larger viewfinder, nor better battery life... and so the list goes on. Yes, the 5100 has higher res movies, hdr, greater color depth, is smaller, lighter and cheaper. Personally, I think movies are for video cameras, hdr is a shortcut to editing the photo yourself; smaller, lighter and cheaper doesn't instill confidence in its build quality, so to gain a little color depth is neither here nor there. I would still pick the D90... that my opinion, for what it's worth [/QUOTE]

Verification