Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Horoscope Fish" data-source="post: 508771" data-attributes="member: 13090">I'm sure. If you notice, EXIF data shows up on images that did NOT get processed by Piccure+. I imagine that's because Piccure+ outputs a .TIFF which was then opened in PS in order to be resized and converted to JPG. I'm assuming the .TIFF conversion stripped the EXIF data.Images processed by Piccure+ do not show EXIF data when posted here but... If you hover your cursor on one you'll see a pop-up that shows the file name. Piccure+ processed photos append &quot;_picc&quot; to the file name. This was how I was able to keep the two JPG's straight in my mind when posting the before and after pics......I'm inclined to agree at this point... I also wonder how much better it could do if I better understood how to use it. I'm wondering if there isn't a 'sweet spot' comprised of just the right combination of Noise Reduction and Sharpening. .....</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Horoscope Fish, post: 508771, member: 13090"] I'm sure. If you notice, EXIF data shows up on images that did NOT get processed by Piccure+. I imagine that's because Piccure+ outputs a .TIFF which was then opened in PS in order to be resized and converted to JPG. I'm assuming the .TIFF conversion stripped the EXIF data. Images processed by Piccure+ do not show EXIF data when posted here but... If you hover your cursor on one you'll see a pop-up that shows the file name. Piccure+ processed photos append "[B]_picc[/B]" to the file name. This was how I was able to keep the two JPG's straight in my mind when posting the before and after pics. [COLOR="#FFFFFF"].....[/COLOR] I'm inclined to agree at this point... I also wonder how much better it could do if I better understood how to use it. I'm wondering if there isn't a 'sweet spot' comprised of just the right combination of Noise Reduction and Sharpening. [COLOR="#FFFFFF"].....[/COLOR] [/QUOTE]

Verification