Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Computers and Software
Photoshop HDR Pro vs. HDR Efex vs Photomatix
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DTigga" data-source="post: 110331" data-attributes="member: 12060"><p>I agree that photmatix does a good job with ghost removal, however I still think Nik has it covered mainly due to its control points. I have on occasion used the in-built photoshop hdr to do the initial merging with ghost removal, when saved it as a 32bit file. I then perform a tone-map with the nik software to great affect.</p><p></p><p>Note that this was when i was using v1 of Nik hdr and I have found v2 to be much better at ghost removal and merging.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DTigga, post: 110331, member: 12060"] I agree that photmatix does a good job with ghost removal, however I still think Nik has it covered mainly due to its control points. I have on occasion used the in-built photoshop hdr to do the initial merging with ghost removal, when saved it as a 32bit file. I then perform a tone-map with the nik software to great affect. Note that this was when i was using v1 of Nik hdr and I have found v2 to be much better at ghost removal and merging. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Computers and Software
Photoshop HDR Pro vs. HDR Efex vs Photomatix
Top
