Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Education
Photography is not a crime
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RocketCowboy" data-source="post: 324675" data-attributes="member: 25095"><p>Thanks for the link. Looks to be some very thorough information there.</p><p></p><p>I agree that the photog was within his rights both in being on the corner and for filming, but both he and the officer did not handle the encounter from the position of trying to avoid escalation. It's my opinion that both the photog and the officer were looking for an escalation, and fortunately neither were lucky enough to get what they wanted.</p><p></p><p>It's anecdotal information, but I've been hearing an increasing number of reports from people taking pictures of courthouses being confronted by LEOs and questioned as to their motives. From the link above, I take this as falling under the "consensual" encounter description, even though an officer may make it appear to be more than that from his tone of voice. The question on whether the photog was free to go is valid, and then I would have left it at that. That said, it's easier to review in hindsight than while it's happening.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RocketCowboy, post: 324675, member: 25095"] Thanks for the link. Looks to be some very thorough information there. I agree that the photog was within his rights both in being on the corner and for filming, but both he and the officer did not handle the encounter from the position of trying to avoid escalation. It's my opinion that both the photog and the officer were looking for an escalation, and fortunately neither were lucky enough to get what they wanted. It's anecdotal information, but I've been hearing an increasing number of reports from people taking pictures of courthouses being confronted by LEOs and questioned as to their motives. From the link above, I take this as falling under the "consensual" encounter description, even though an officer may make it appear to be more than that from his tone of voice. The question on whether the photog was free to go is valid, and then I would have left it at that. That said, it's easier to review in hindsight than while it's happening. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Education
Photography is not a crime
Top