Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Photographer Sued for $28 Million
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AxeMan - Rick S." data-source="post: 39624" data-attributes="member: 1746"><p>There are a lot of wrongs with this whole thing. Bottom line: sex sells and "people" have pushed the envelope here. With our judicial system as messed up as it is, now they are going to push that envelope too. As immoral as this shot is, this is nothing but a moneymaker and free press for all parties involved, whether it's positive or negative.</p><p> </p><p>If the photographer wanted to pose the model that way I really don't have a problem with that. Not saying the pose is acceptable. What I do have a problem with is he shot her spread eagle. I think there were other angles he could have shot her at to get the effect he was looking for. This is one of those photos that should have been deleted in post processing or not taken in the first place.</p><p> </p><p> I want to blame the photographer for letting the photo out. WHAT was he thinking? wait, I know, sex sells, what a shame. Funny what greed can do to a persons rational thinking process<strong>.</strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AxeMan - Rick S., post: 39624, member: 1746"] There are a lot of wrongs with this whole thing. Bottom line: sex sells and "people" have pushed the envelope here. With our judicial system as messed up as it is, now they are going to push that envelope too. As immoral as this shot is, this is nothing but a moneymaker and free press for all parties involved, whether it's positive or negative. If the photographer wanted to pose the model that way I really don't have a problem with that. Not saying the pose is acceptable. What I do have a problem with is he shot her spread eagle. I think there were other angles he could have shot her at to get the effect he was looking for. This is one of those photos that should have been deleted in post processing or not taken in the first place. I want to blame the photographer for letting the photo out. WHAT was he thinking? wait, I know, sex sells, what a shame. Funny what greed can do to a persons rational thinking process[B].[/B] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Photographer Sued for $28 Million
Top