Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Photographer Sued for $28 Million
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RickSawThat" data-source="post: 39348" data-attributes="member: 8289"><p>The photographer typically does not choose which shots are used it's the ad agency and the client. I'm sure there was an art director at the shoot, why isn't he named in this suit as well? So only the photographer get's named? Not the parents who allowed it? Not the ad agency? Not the client?</p><p></p><p>I don't agree with asking a 15 year old model to pose in such a way but the lawsuit I also do not agree with. Over the years ther have been so many similar lawsuits and images but yet the ad world keeps pushing images like this...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RickSawThat, post: 39348, member: 8289"] The photographer typically does not choose which shots are used it's the ad agency and the client. I'm sure there was an art director at the shoot, why isn't he named in this suit as well? So only the photographer get's named? Not the parents who allowed it? Not the ad agency? Not the client? I don't agree with asking a 15 year old model to pose in such a way but the lawsuit I also do not agree with. Over the years ther have been so many similar lawsuits and images but yet the ad world keeps pushing images like this... [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Photographer Sued for $28 Million
Top
