Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
photo question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Horoscope Fish" data-source="post: 447128" data-attributes="member: 13090"><p>Yes, I believe so; but don't quote me on that...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Absolutely true there's only so much you can do with a screwed up image, but it's pretty amazing what you can salvage with the right tools, too. The one filter did a lot and with a full-size RAW file to work with I'm thinking it would have a far, far better job. </p><p></p><p>The Adobe CC package for photographers is only $10 a month and if you're serious about doing this whole photography thing, it's something you might want to give some serious consideration to.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Horoscope Fish, post: 447128, member: 13090"] Yes, I believe so; but don't quote me on that... Absolutely true there's only so much you can do with a screwed up image, but it's pretty amazing what you can salvage with the right tools, too. The one filter did a lot and with a full-size RAW file to work with I'm thinking it would have a far, far better job. The Adobe CC package for photographers is only $10 a month and if you're serious about doing this whole photography thing, it's something you might want to give some serious consideration to. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
photo question
Top
