Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
General Digital SLR Cameras
Photo Editing is No Substitute for Photography Technique
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="480sparky" data-source="post: 179966" data-attributes="member: 15805"><p>Back in the film days, when one wanted to <strong>really</strong> take control of their images, they carved off a corner of their basement, walled it up, light-proofed it, installed plumbing, counters and a special light fixture and worked with lethal, stinky chemicals for hours on end to achieve the results they wanted. Such persons were generally considered a 'cut above' the ordinary photographers who sent their film to labs.</p><p></p><p>I find it hilarious/curious/astounding that today, the digital equivalent is somehow considered improper, illegal, immoral and just downright wrong. I don't "fix" my images in post........ I continue the photographic process by performing the steps that are impossible to do in the camera.</p><p></p><p>As long as I get the results I wanted, then why should you care whether my technique involves spending 5 minutes at a computer?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="480sparky, post: 179966, member: 15805"] Back in the film days, when one wanted to [B]really[/B] take control of their images, they carved off a corner of their basement, walled it up, light-proofed it, installed plumbing, counters and a special light fixture and worked with lethal, stinky chemicals for hours on end to achieve the results they wanted. Such persons were generally considered a 'cut above' the ordinary photographers who sent their film to labs. I find it hilarious/curious/astounding that today, the digital equivalent is somehow considered improper, illegal, immoral and just downright wrong. I don't "fix" my images in post........ I continue the photographic process by performing the steps that are impossible to do in the camera. As long as I get the results I wanted, then why should you care whether my technique involves spending 5 minutes at a computer? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
General Digital SLR Cameras
Photo Editing is No Substitute for Photography Technique
Top