Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
General Digital SLR Cameras
Photo Editing is No Substitute for Photography Technique
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="stmv" data-source="post: 179958" data-attributes="member: 10038"><p>such an old debate, would say the average edit for me is 4 minute,, just because I have to move the sliders in levels for the raw images, usually a hair in sharpness, usually dust spot here and there.. None of these is more than completing the process.</p><p></p><p>and then there is the </p><p></p><p>darn person that is not key to the composition</p><p></p><p>the correction of angles some time</p><p></p><p>and then when time permits,, more and more,, just for fun,, or artistic direction.</p><p></p><p></p><p>and .. I get SO TIRED of non Photographers giving me a tough time on this subject, As long as you are upfront</p><p>that you take photos beyound the image,, it should not be a concern for them,, if the don't like, well don't look. </p><p></p><p>and I love an article that showed that so so many of the famous shots even back to Abe Lincoln were composites</p><p></p><p>Heck, they put Lincoln head on a Senator from the South (because he looked to thin).. so,, it is such a tired tired</p><p>debate, and non photographers, have been duped since photography began,,,, and just don't understand. </p><p></p><p>If you don't want to edit, buy a point and shoot, JPEG,, an be happy.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="stmv, post: 179958, member: 10038"] such an old debate, would say the average edit for me is 4 minute,, just because I have to move the sliders in levels for the raw images, usually a hair in sharpness, usually dust spot here and there.. None of these is more than completing the process. and then there is the darn person that is not key to the composition the correction of angles some time and then when time permits,, more and more,, just for fun,, or artistic direction. and .. I get SO TIRED of non Photographers giving me a tough time on this subject, As long as you are upfront that you take photos beyound the image,, it should not be a concern for them,, if the don't like, well don't look. and I love an article that showed that so so many of the famous shots even back to Abe Lincoln were composites Heck, they put Lincoln head on a Senator from the South (because he looked to thin).. so,, it is such a tired tired debate, and non photographers, have been duped since photography began,,,, and just don't understand. If you don't want to edit, buy a point and shoot, JPEG,, an be happy. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
General Digital SLR Cameras
Photo Editing is No Substitute for Photography Technique
Top