Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Paul's random pictures.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Vincent" data-source="post: 472669" data-attributes="member: 15675"><p>I like the scene and the shade = good subject and light. That makes the picture worth it.</p><p></p><p>However I have trouble with the composition. I tend to be convinced that even centralised pictures need to adhere to the rule of thirds to work, that means that the subject needs to touch the golden points. Anybody who really likes this composition? (The only rule is break the rules) And why?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Vincent, post: 472669, member: 15675"] I like the scene and the shade = good subject and light. That makes the picture worth it. However I have trouble with the composition. I tend to be convinced that even centralised pictures need to adhere to the rule of thirds to work, that means that the subject needs to touch the golden points. Anybody who really likes this composition? (The only rule is break the rules) And why? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Paul's random pictures.
Top
