Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Geoffc" data-source="post: 106574" data-attributes="member: 8705">I've now been out today with the 24-120 and taken some real shots, both handheld and on the tripod. Using the tripod with mup and cable they are blisteringly sharp. Handheld with a little thought they are pretty&nbsp; good.I'm now thinking it is more of an issue with the 50 mm and the effects of focus stacking. I will probably end up biasing the AFtune to wider aperturesMy current thoughts are that if you take the shots properly you will be rewarded. If you are sloppy the punishment will be harsh. This camera does demand technique, whereas the D600 was a real carefree pleasure to&nbsp; use.I think when you view an image on the camera you are seeing a jpeg embedded in the raw. I understand that this applies the picture controls.&nbsp; I have now increased the sharpness and contrast and the images seem much better on the camera. If this isn't the case it must be a placebo effect!!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Geoffc, post: 106574, member: 8705"] I've now been out today with the 24-120 and taken some real shots, both handheld and on the tripod. Using the tripod with mup and cable they are blisteringly sharp. Handheld with a little thought they are pretty good. I'm now thinking it is more of an issue with the 50 mm and the effects of focus stacking. I will probably end up biasing the AFtune to wider apertures My current thoughts are that if you take the shots properly you will be rewarded. If you are sloppy the punishment will be harsh. This camera does demand technique, whereas the D600 was a real carefree pleasure to use. I think when you view an image on the camera you are seeing a jpeg embedded in the raw. I understand that this applies the picture controls. I have now increased the sharpness and contrast and the images seem much better on the camera. If this isn't the case it must be a placebo effect!! [/QUOTE]

Verification