Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="hark" data-source="post: 635563" data-attributes="member: 13196"><p>But isn't that exactly why a DF was created? The DF was supposed to replicate the old-fashioned manual cameras which didn't have a lot of bells and whistles but were able to take spectacular photos. If it had more mega pixels, I would love to try it; however, the ability to print enlargements (BIG ones) is important to me. And yes, I know there is software which can yield excellent results for that. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /> Personally I prefer either manual mode or aperture priority with exposure compensation, and the largest RAW files possible. Buffer speed isn't needed for my preferences as I don't use a lot of the bells and whistles on of any of my bodies. But there are owners who love their DF bodies!</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="hark, post: 635563, member: 13196"] But isn't that exactly why a DF was created? The DF was supposed to replicate the old-fashioned manual cameras which didn't have a lot of bells and whistles but were able to take spectacular photos. If it had more mega pixels, I would love to try it; however, the ability to print enlargements (BIG ones) is important to me. And yes, I know there is software which can yield excellent results for that. ;) Personally I prefer either manual mode or aperture priority with exposure compensation, and the largest RAW files possible. Buffer speed isn't needed for my preferences as I don't use a lot of the bells and whistles on of any of my bodies. But there are owners who love their DF bodies! [/QUOTE]

Verification