Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
DF
Not much action in here
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="lokatz" data-source="post: 635548" data-attributes="member: 43924"><p>Hi Jip, No contest as far as that statement goes: for the images you took, you did not need any other features. What really kills this body for me is the dated AF, because that means I will lose shots I could get with Nikon's more advanced, but not necessarily more expensive bodies (action, street, wildlife, etc.). You do not seem to be doing much in those departments, plus you seem to like the rather peculiar ways in which the Df operates, so you should definitely enjoy this body. Not questioning that at all.</p><p></p><p>There are a lot of cheaper options out there than the Df where your statement would be equally true, though. Hence my 'less for more' statement, by which I stand. I'll admit that I am not as thrilled by the looks as some people are, and that is a matter of taste so it should not be argued. To me, the Df is the same kind of fashion statement that an iPhone 7 is: if you're thrilled to have it, then enjoy it and ignore the fact that there is better performing gear out there that costs less. Not everyone feels that way, though, and my previous post aimed to fill those folks in on some of the Df's absent features.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="lokatz, post: 635548, member: 43924"] Hi Jip, No contest as far as that statement goes: for the images you took, you did not need any other features. What really kills this body for me is the dated AF, because that means I will lose shots I could get with Nikon's more advanced, but not necessarily more expensive bodies (action, street, wildlife, etc.). You do not seem to be doing much in those departments, plus you seem to like the rather peculiar ways in which the Df operates, so you should definitely enjoy this body. Not questioning that at all. There are a lot of cheaper options out there than the Df where your statement would be equally true, though. Hence my 'less for more' statement, by which I stand. I'll admit that I am not as thrilled by the looks as some people are, and that is a matter of taste so it should not be argued. To me, the Df is the same kind of fashion statement that an iPhone 7 is: if you're thrilled to have it, then enjoy it and ignore the fact that there is better performing gear out there that costs less. Not everyone feels that way, though, and my previous post aimed to fill those folks in on some of the Df's absent features. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
DF
Not much action in here
Top