Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Not just a what FX lens question.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jon Rowlison" data-source="post: 475954" data-attributes="member: 32211"><p>The 28-300mm is at f/3.5-4.0 only to about 40mm. It's f/5 to about 70mm and then f/5.3-f/5.6 through the rest of the range to 300mm. I guess it's not nearly as wide as I'd thought at lower focal distances. That may be enough reason to pick the 24-120mm at a constant f/4 if you only need shots up to 120mm.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jon Rowlison, post: 475954, member: 32211"] The 28-300mm is at f/3.5-4.0 only to about 40mm. It's f/5 to about 70mm and then f/5.3-f/5.6 through the rest of the range to 300mm. I guess it's not nearly as wide as I'd thought at lower focal distances. That may be enough reason to pick the 24-120mm at a constant f/4 if you only need shots up to 120mm. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Not just a what FX lens question.
Top