Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Not just a what FX lens question.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ad B" data-source="post: 474744" data-attributes="member: 37491"><p>Hi Mike,</p><p></p><p>I have my D750 now for 5,5 months. :heart:</p><p>I bought it with the 24-85 VR kit lens, but I liked the reach of 120 mm better, much better.</p><p>So I sold the 24-85 lens and bought a secondhand 24-120 f4 VR lens.</p><p>It's such a good walk around lens.</p><p>For my 70-200 f4 vr lens I bought a Kenko Teleplus 1.4 Pro300 DGX extender.</p><p>And it also works with my 24-120 lens!!</p><p>The 24-120 lens at 120 mm + the Kenko extender becomes a 170 mm F5.6 lens at FX mode!</p><p>At the 1.2 mode it gets to 200 mm f5.6 and in DX mode even a 250 mm f5.6</p><p>For city trips or holidays flying by plane, so traveling light, I only have this lens + the Kenko with me.</p><p>Picture quality is staying very good with the Kenko attached!</p><p>For me, no "Holy Grail" like the non VR Nikon 24-70 F2.8 <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite6" alt=":cool:" title="Cool :cool:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":cool:" /></p><p>I don't need a 2.8 lens (bigger, heavier, more expensive), when you get very good pics at higher ISO's with this camera.</p><p></p><p>My lenses: Nikon 24-120 f4 vr; Nikon 70-200 f4 VR; Sigma 150-600 f5-6.3 OS Contemporary</p><p>Plus my Kenko Teleplus 1.4x PRO300 DGX extender</p><p>Ad B</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ad B, post: 474744, member: 37491"] Hi Mike, I have my D750 now for 5,5 months. :heart: I bought it with the 24-85 VR kit lens, but I liked the reach of 120 mm better, much better. So I sold the 24-85 lens and bought a secondhand 24-120 f4 VR lens. It's such a good walk around lens. For my 70-200 f4 vr lens I bought a Kenko Teleplus 1.4 Pro300 DGX extender. And it also works with my 24-120 lens!! The 24-120 lens at 120 mm + the Kenko extender becomes a 170 mm F5.6 lens at FX mode! At the 1.2 mode it gets to 200 mm f5.6 and in DX mode even a 250 mm f5.6 For city trips or holidays flying by plane, so traveling light, I only have this lens + the Kenko with me. Picture quality is staying very good with the Kenko attached! For me, no "Holy Grail" like the non VR Nikon 24-70 F2.8 :cool: I don't need a 2.8 lens (bigger, heavier, more expensive), when you get very good pics at higher ISO's with this camera. My lenses: Nikon 24-120 f4 vr; Nikon 70-200 f4 VR; Sigma 150-600 f5-6.3 OS Contemporary Plus my Kenko Teleplus 1.4x PRO300 DGX extender Ad B [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Not just a what FX lens question.
Top