Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikonites
New Member Introductions
Noob to the site and photography
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mycenius" data-source="post: 171787" data-attributes="member: 14714"><p>Tell me about it - I had the same misconception in my head until just recently - despite having DX series cameras (& lenses) since the D70 came out about 2004...! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite11" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll eyes :rolleyes:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":rolleyes:" /> Always assumed DX lens focal length was actual and not subject to x1.5! :ambivalence:</p><p></p><p>Remember, the DX notation on the lens is about other factors:</p><p></p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">The lens' diameter (it's smaller to suit the smaller sensor - so will vignette images if used on a full size 35mm FX camera)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">The lens' glass - it's in theory got allowance for being specifically used on digital cameras (although perhaps less relevant now as Nikon do this for pretty much all their lenses)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">The lens' construction - will tend to usually use more plastics (albeit space age high strength stuff) - so will be lighter than standard FX lenses, BUT may not feel <em>as solid</em> as a result (although still good construction, there is a different <em>feel </em>to most DX lenses compared to FX ones</li> </ol><p></p><p><img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite6" alt=":cool:" title="Cool :cool:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":cool:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mycenius, post: 171787, member: 14714"] Tell me about it - I had the same misconception in my head until just recently - despite having DX series cameras (& lenses) since the D70 came out about 2004...! :rolleyes: Always assumed DX lens focal length was actual and not subject to x1.5! :ambivalence: Remember, the DX notation on the lens is about other factors: [LIST=1] [*]The lens' diameter (it's smaller to suit the smaller sensor - so will vignette images if used on a full size 35mm FX camera) [*]The lens' glass - it's in theory got allowance for being specifically used on digital cameras (although perhaps less relevant now as Nikon do this for pretty much all their lenses) [*]The lens' construction - will tend to usually use more plastics (albeit space age high strength stuff) - so will be lighter than standard FX lenses, BUT may not feel [I]as solid[/I] as a result (although still good construction, there is a different [I]feel [/I]to most DX lenses compared to FX ones [/LIST] :cool: [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikonites
New Member Introductions
Noob to the site and photography
Top