Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
"Noise" criticism? -Bah humbug!! (Warning; -a RANT! ">})
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DaveKoontz" data-source="post: 2611" data-attributes="member: 315"><p>I'm going to take another view of this issue. Most all of the 'stock' sites will blow an image up to a minimum of 100% and will reject for any noise, dirt, abberation, etc. even though most sites won't offer an enlargement to this size. Tick you off? yes! But it's part of their quality control as their customers demand high quality, high resolution images. You might think about this as a possible quality control check you could employ into your own workflow. Quality is Quality, Snapshots are Snapshots.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DaveKoontz, post: 2611, member: 315"] I'm going to take another view of this issue. Most all of the 'stock' sites will blow an image up to a minimum of 100% and will reject for any noise, dirt, abberation, etc. even though most sites won't offer an enlargement to this size. Tick you off? yes! But it's part of their quality control as their customers demand high quality, high resolution images. You might think about this as a possible quality control check you could employ into your own workflow. Quality is Quality, Snapshots are Snapshots. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
"Noise" criticism? -Bah humbug!! (Warning; -a RANT! ">})
Top
