Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Nikon's New 300mm f/4 Looks Impressive
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="aroy" data-source="post: 476613" data-attributes="member: 16090"><p>I think that "Equivalence" thing has confused the issue. A 300mm focal length remains the same whether it was designed for a 3x4mm sensor of a cell phone or for a 8"x10" large format camera. What changes is the Image Circle which for a 3x4mm sensor need not be more than 5mm dia, but has to be at least 30mm for DX, 45mm for FF, 85mm for MF and 330mm for an 8"x10".</p><p></p><p>What a larger Image Circle entails is more glass in front and a more complicated design, hence more cost. That is why a lens designed for a particular sensor size (and a given maximum aperture) is the least cost option.</p><p></p><p> As has been said a number of times is that as you decrease the sensor size only FOV changes. As smaller sensors are denser, you get more details, which gives us the "magnification".</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="aroy, post: 476613, member: 16090"] I think that "Equivalence" thing has confused the issue. A 300mm focal length remains the same whether it was designed for a 3x4mm sensor of a cell phone or for a 8"x10" large format camera. What changes is the Image Circle which for a 3x4mm sensor need not be more than 5mm dia, but has to be at least 30mm for DX, 45mm for FF, 85mm for MF and 330mm for an 8"x10". What a larger Image Circle entails is more glass in front and a more complicated design, hence more cost. That is why a lens designed for a particular sensor size (and a given maximum aperture) is the least cost option. As has been said a number of times is that as you decrease the sensor size only FOV changes. As smaller sensors are denser, you get more details, which gives us the "magnification". [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
Nikon's New 300mm f/4 Looks Impressive
Top