Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="J-see" data-source="post: 476294" data-attributes="member: 31330">It depends on how you apply the "myth". <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" />Ignoring the quality differences between sensors; an FX lens delivers the exact same quality to the sensor whether it is an FX or DX sensor. The weaker part of the lens gets lost on those smaller sensors but the best part isn't any better; it's the exact same. That an FX lens delivers a better image than a DX lens on a DX sensor is only under the assumption the DX lens we compare it to has an equal quality at the center and a lower quality further from there. There are plenty of old FX lenses of which even the best part can't compete with a good DX lens.</blockquote>