Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Mirrorless Z
Z Lenses
Nikon Z s 24-70 2.8 vs the f4
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rick M" data-source="post: 726972" data-attributes="member: 4399"><p>Thank you for the update/insight.</p><p></p><p>I had the 70-200 f4 when it first came out and was a favorite lens, good IQ and somewhat compact. I really liked the fact that it was all internal, something I'm always looking for in a lens. The new s 70-200 2.8 is being criticized for it's size (compared to Canon), but I'll take all internal mechanisms over a dust pump any day. </p><p></p><p>I've been holding off on the 14-30 f4 and have the 20mm s1.8 on pre-order. I'm hoping that satisfies my wide needs as I'd really rather have a prime. The s 20 looks to be right up there with the s 50.</p><p></p><p>Which brings me to the mid-range and probably waiting for the s 24-105 f4 before I commit to the kit f4 or 2.8 </p><p></p><p>Tough decisions, but a great new system to be in. Nikon has really stepped up the game!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rick M, post: 726972, member: 4399"] Thank you for the update/insight. I had the 70-200 f4 when it first came out and was a favorite lens, good IQ and somewhat compact. I really liked the fact that it was all internal, something I'm always looking for in a lens. The new s 70-200 2.8 is being criticized for it's size (compared to Canon), but I'll take all internal mechanisms over a dust pump any day. I've been holding off on the 14-30 f4 and have the 20mm s1.8 on pre-order. I'm hoping that satisfies my wide needs as I'd really rather have a prime. The s 20 looks to be right up there with the s 50. Which brings me to the mid-range and probably waiting for the s 24-105 f4 before I commit to the kit f4 or 2.8 Tough decisions, but a great new system to be in. Nikon has really stepped up the game! [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Mirrorless Z
Z Lenses
Nikon Z s 24-70 2.8 vs the f4
Top