Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Mirrorless Z
Z Lenses
Nikon Z s 24-70 2.8 vs the f4
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rick M" data-source="post: 718808" data-attributes="member: 4399"><p>Thank you for the in-depth response. Reviews and videos get so tedious and few are impartial. I typically shoot landscapes, some portraits but not professionally. I wouldn't need f2.8 for landscapes unless there was a measurable difference in the corners. It sounds like the 14-30 is perfect for my needs. When I was shooting Nikon years ago I often considered the 14-24 2.8 but wasn't interested in the filter systems it would require.</p><p></p><p>The 24-70 2.8 really has me thinking in regards to events and capturing the grandchildren as they grow (fast moving portrait targets). So I guess I'm trying to decide if the F4 has <em>enough</em> subject isolation. With that said I will certainly add the 85 1.8 down the road if I go with the f4; but would I if I had the 2.8 would I need to...., . I've noticed some used F4's showing up for sale and I'm guessing it's folks upgrading to the 2.8, which is what I hope to avoid. </p><p></p><p>Thank you for your thoughts.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rick M, post: 718808, member: 4399"] Thank you for the in-depth response. Reviews and videos get so tedious and few are impartial. I typically shoot landscapes, some portraits but not professionally. I wouldn't need f2.8 for landscapes unless there was a measurable difference in the corners. It sounds like the 14-30 is perfect for my needs. When I was shooting Nikon years ago I often considered the 14-24 2.8 but wasn't interested in the filter systems it would require. The 24-70 2.8 really has me thinking in regards to events and capturing the grandchildren as they grow (fast moving portrait targets). So I guess I'm trying to decide if the F4 has [I]enough[/I] subject isolation. With that said I will certainly add the 85 1.8 down the road if I go with the f4; but would I if I had the 2.8 would I need to...., . I've noticed some used F4's showing up for sale and I'm guessing it's folks upgrading to the 2.8, which is what I hope to avoid. Thank you for your thoughts. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Mirrorless Z
Z Lenses
Nikon Z s 24-70 2.8 vs the f4
Top