Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon Compact Digital Cameras
Mirrorless
Nikon: you owe us a n1 v4 NOW
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="crisscross" data-source="post: 542432" data-attributes="member: 8717"><p>I have now taken about 600 frames with the n1j5, about half with the 70-300 lens, and my n3 is just back from repair. The j5 results are among my best bird pics (including D7000 + 80-400DX) and I have got used to handling the camera with the Goliton loupe on the back. It is now the v3 that feels clumsy with the clip-on evf perched on top, the aperture adjustment on the front, relatively fiddly on-off switch and extra weight. As a bonus the £6 Goliton makes it possible to tripod mount the 70-300 lens for rather less than the £50 official adaptor.</p><p></p><p>If a v4 came out tomorrow, I am not sure I would now bother! Obviously depending on other positive changes.</p><p></p><p>Looking at it less steamed up, a lot of the DSLR features whose loss I was feeling are arguably unnecessary anyway. No mirror, so you don't need 'mirror up' and remote; 90% of images taken in the field need a little crop or tilt, so is the viewfinder so essential; the exposure metering does what it should ie just avoid blown highlights, so does one need 'highlights' in the review display; does one need dozens of focus points when a finger-tip on the LCD choses the right place for a single focus point in a fraction of a second? </p><p></p><p>Obviously a 1" sensor with present resolution is poor and allows very little crop, but I doubt the technology has hit the buffers. But a kit covering 27-810 35mm equiv weighing 1310gr is no mean weight reduction, especially for us greyhairs.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="crisscross, post: 542432, member: 8717"] I have now taken about 600 frames with the n1j5, about half with the 70-300 lens, and my n3 is just back from repair. The j5 results are among my best bird pics (including D7000 + 80-400DX) and I have got used to handling the camera with the Goliton loupe on the back. It is now the v3 that feels clumsy with the clip-on evf perched on top, the aperture adjustment on the front, relatively fiddly on-off switch and extra weight. As a bonus the £6 Goliton makes it possible to tripod mount the 70-300 lens for rather less than the £50 official adaptor. If a v4 came out tomorrow, I am not sure I would now bother! Obviously depending on other positive changes. Looking at it less steamed up, a lot of the DSLR features whose loss I was feeling are arguably unnecessary anyway. No mirror, so you don't need 'mirror up' and remote; 90% of images taken in the field need a little crop or tilt, so is the viewfinder so essential; the exposure metering does what it should ie just avoid blown highlights, so does one need 'highlights' in the review display; does one need dozens of focus points when a finger-tip on the LCD choses the right place for a single focus point in a fraction of a second? Obviously a 1" sensor with present resolution is poor and allows very little crop, but I doubt the technology has hit the buffers. But a kit covering 27-810 35mm equiv weighing 1310gr is no mean weight reduction, especially for us greyhairs. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon Compact Digital Cameras
Mirrorless
Nikon: you owe us a n1 v4 NOW
Top