Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
General Digital SLR Cameras
Nikon vs. Canon for the working photographer
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BackdoorArts" data-source="post: 239059" data-attributes="member: 9240"><p>I read this blog on Nikon Rumors today and found it very enlightening. It's essentially one <em><strong>working </strong></em>Nikon photographer's experience in shooting Canon for the first time and his evaluation of the differences. I emphasize "working" because it's about an aspect many of us here don't think about - the need to have immediately shareable images straight out of the camera. My brother, as you all know by now, is professional photojournalist and is pretty much required to shoot JPEG since photos need to be uploaded almost immediately after an event for publication. In his words, "I've barely got time to get them transferred to my laptop for upload let alone do a bunch of RAW tweaking. There's no way I can afford to shoot RAW, particularly with sports." In the past he's expressed how impressed he is with the performance of Nikon's sensors, particularly with high ISO, so until I read this blog I didn't quite understand why so many pros shoot Canon.</p><p></p><p>The article title is a little misleading as this person "switched" because they had to for an event and did not switch permanently. A lot of points he made have me thinking more about what I would do if I needed to post my images straight out of camera? </p><p></p><p><a href="http://nikonrumors.com/2013/12/30/guest-post-switching-from-nikon-to-canon.aspx/" target="_blank">Guest post: switching from Nikon to Canon | Nikon Rumors</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BackdoorArts, post: 239059, member: 9240"] I read this blog on Nikon Rumors today and found it very enlightening. It's essentially one [I][B]working [/B][/I]Nikon photographer's experience in shooting Canon for the first time and his evaluation of the differences. I emphasize "working" because it's about an aspect many of us here don't think about - the need to have immediately shareable images straight out of the camera. My brother, as you all know by now, is professional photojournalist and is pretty much required to shoot JPEG since photos need to be uploaded almost immediately after an event for publication. In his words, "I've barely got time to get them transferred to my laptop for upload let alone do a bunch of RAW tweaking. There's no way I can afford to shoot RAW, particularly with sports." In the past he's expressed how impressed he is with the performance of Nikon's sensors, particularly with high ISO, so until I read this blog I didn't quite understand why so many pros shoot Canon. The article title is a little misleading as this person "switched" because they had to for an event and did not switch permanently. A lot of points he made have me thinking more about what I would do if I needed to post my images straight out of camera? [url=http://nikonrumors.com/2013/12/30/guest-post-switching-from-nikon-to-canon.aspx/]Guest post: switching from Nikon to Canon | Nikon Rumors[/url] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
General Digital SLR Cameras
Nikon vs. Canon for the working photographer
Top