Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="rocketman122" data-source="post: 307704" data-attributes="member: 14443">absolutely. like I said in my first post, anyone wanting to get serious and become a pro wedding photog doesnt need to buy a single nikon lens to get stellar IQ. tokina 16-28 2.8/tamron 24-70 VC/ 70-200VC and youre set. add the sigma 50(not art) the sigma 85 1.4 and sigma 15mm fisheye, the tokina 105 macro and even sigma is coming out with a 24-70 f/2 OS and a 135 1.8.  you can have a complete set of pro gear for weddings without even worrying about build or IQ. when a few years back it was a compromise, but not today. as well buy the yongnuo 568 flagship flash for less than half of the SB910, or better yet, the phottix mitros for $300, has almost everything the SB910 has (and things the SB910 doesnt) and 2 years warranty vs nikons 1 years. battery grips at 1/5 the nikon price and batteries as well. theyve been ripping people off for years and people are tired of having to pay so much. thats it nikon, its over. those days of paying so much for top performing flash and excellent battery grips are over.I agree 100%. build quality on the plastic lenses today look nice but they are very cheap in feel. love the feel of my rock solid metal 85 1.8d. with metal filter thread!the g looks impressive till you hold and realize theres nothing there. cheap hood and slow AF.  I held the 58mm 1.4 and I laughed my a** off wondering how they have the balls to ask $1700 for a plastic lens with plastic filter thread. they look nice but feel very cheap when you hold it. not like it used to be. now they make them big looking but doesnt even have weight to it. im sure everyhting inside is plastic. some say "yea, but its high quality plastic" what like tupperware? no thank you. ill take metal lenses any day over plastic.nikons not going out of business. money wise theyre ok.  but its a downward spiral and only now are they starting to really realize it. they are very stubborn in their ways. all about honor to them. when things get bad then they change. I said it my posts that this quarterly revenue, it will be bad. yes, ridiculous prices. in this crappy economy they need to realize they cant charge they crazy prices. $3000 price jump for the new 400 2.8.  old generation zooms vs new ones are not in proportion to anything and are way too high. the 14-24/17-35/24-70/70-200VR2/80-400 compared to the older lenses they sold for is just ridiculous. sure we expect inflation and a little price jump, but crap some of them are ripoff prices.when I saw the price tag, I clearly thought, nikon is clueless. they have no clue. $1200 for the v3, theyre quite stupid. like the stripped off features,  DF at $3000. a lot were hyped up to get it. the second they saw the greedy $3000 price tag, people were pissed. you take an extra $100 for the 50 1.8 because it has a metal ring? youre theives nikon. theyre rude for asking so much. the only thing about the camera is the low light performance. but removed video and crap AF negates that. I even think the look works against it, but thats my opinion only.</blockquote>

Verification