Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
Nikon restructuring?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="STM" data-source="post: 308186" data-attributes="member: 12827"><p>I have to disagree with you about film. Film is <em>far</em> from going the way of the dinosaurs, it is just becoming more of a niche market. I know probably about 75% of all the professional photographers here in town and, like me, almost to a man they prefer to shoot their <em>personal</em> stuff on film. For my personal stuff I prefer the Hasselblad over everything else but I can't post much of it here for obvious reasons. It's quality blows the doors off digital. I only switch to 35mm when I need a focal length that is not covered by the 5 Carl Zeiss lenses I have. No one will dispute however that for commercial work digital is better because it allows much quicker turnaround times and is less expensive overall next to film and with a large enough card you have essential unlimited frames available. Back in the day when Hasselblad was king for weddings, you had to have a least a half dozen or more A12 magazines and assistants to load and unload them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="STM, post: 308186, member: 12827"] I have to disagree with you about film. Film is [I]far[/I] from going the way of the dinosaurs, it is just becoming more of a niche market. I know probably about 75% of all the professional photographers here in town and, like me, almost to a man they prefer to shoot their [I]personal[/I] stuff on film. For my personal stuff I prefer the Hasselblad over everything else but I can't post much of it here for obvious reasons. It's quality blows the doors off digital. I only switch to 35mm when I need a focal length that is not covered by the 5 Carl Zeiss lenses I have. No one will dispute however that for commercial work digital is better because it allows much quicker turnaround times and is less expensive overall next to film and with a large enough card you have essential unlimited frames available. Back in the day when Hasselblad was king for weddings, you had to have a least a half dozen or more A12 magazines and assistants to load and unload them. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
Nikon restructuring?
Top